Voice intake for global research teams
AI researchers and safety leads often work in mixed-language teams. Reporters can dictate their report in any of 17 languages. The server only ever sees the text.

AI-virksomheder står over for en specifik version af EU-direktivet om beskyttelse af whistleblowere: globale forskningsteams, flersproget personale og omdømmerisici, der er højere end i de fleste brancher. Vi giver dig en kanal, der opfylder direktiv 2019/1937, passer til hvordan AI-teams faktisk arbejder, og består en rigtig indkøbs due diligence-spørgeskema.
5 min
Fra tilmelding til en fungerende indberetningskanal.
17
Sprog til globale forskningsteams. Stemmeinput, ingen separat side pr. sprog.
0
Gemte lydoptagelser. Lyd transskriberes i browseren og slettes. Vi ser det aldrig.
E2E
End-to-end-kryptering. Whistlebloweren har nøglen. Vi kan ikke læse indholdet.
Overview
The EU Whistleblower Directive 2019/1937 applies to any legal entity with 50+ employees that operates in the EU, regardless of industry. AI companies hit this threshold early — often at Series A — and once they sell to enterprise customers, the requirement is reinforced by procurement due-diligence questionnaires that ask for a documented internal reporting channel. The AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) does not itself require a whistleblower channel, but it does require general-purpose AI providers to have internal grievance mechanisms for fundamental-rights issues. A single channel covers both obligations without operational overlap.
What applies to you
Most AI companies we work with are navigating two parallel compliance regimes at once. Here is what the law actually requires — and where our channel maps onto it.
Internal reporting channels for legal entities with 50+ employees. Seven-day acknowledgment, three-month feedback, no retaliation. Member-state law (e.g. HinSchG in Germany, Loi Sapin II in France) layers on local specifics.
General-purpose AI providers must enable fundamental-rights complaints. Our internal channel routes those to the right team without changing the data flow.
Enterprise customers routinely include a "describe your internal reporting channel" question in their vendor security questionnaires. Saying "email us" is not a passing answer in 2026.
Anti-retaliation duties apply to the AI company once a report is filed. Documented intake + case history is the employer's strongest defense in any subsequent dispute.
AI-virksomheder, der stræber efter disse certificeringer, har brug for en dokumenteret, reviderbar indtagelses- og sagsstyringsproces. Vores sagsbegivenhedslog med tidsstempler og handlende brugere er det revisionsspor, der understøtter disse krav — det er ikke hele revisionen, men det er den mest testede del.
Why Ashio for AI
The reason most AI companies pick us over a generic ticketing tool or a Slack-channel workaround.
AI researchers and safety leads often work in mixed-language teams. Reporters can dictate their report in any of 17 languages. The server only ever sees the text.
Every case gets a unique URL the reporter can use to follow up anonymously. No login, no account, no friction. Same model as how Linear and Notion share issues.
Whistlebloweren krypterer indberetningen i browseren med en nøgle, som kun de har. Jeres sikkerhedsansvarlige dekrypterer. Vi kan ikke læse indholdet.
Selv under direktivets tærskel på 50 ansatte hjælper en dokumenteret intern indberetningskanal med at bestå virksomheders due diligence-spørgeskemaer. Mange af vores kunder under 50 ansatte implementerer den før Series A til SOC 2-revisionen, eller fordi deres første enterprise-kunde bad om den i leverandørsikkerhedsspørgeskemaet.
Reports can be auto-assigned to your safety lead, your DPO, or your compliance officer based on the report category. No manual triage required.
Sagslisten filtrerer efter kategori — model bias, databeskyttelse, evalueringsintegritet med mere. Hver indberetning bærer sin kategori fra indsendelse, så din sikkerhedsansvarlige kun kan hente de relevante elementer.
Compliance checklist
A pre-flight list for AI companies about to sign a contract that requires a documented reporting channel.
Most procurement questionnaires ask for this as a hard requirement. A live URL with a unique access link per case is the standard answer.
The directive requires feedback to the reporter within seven days. We enforce this with a per-case deadline that is visible to every admin from day one.
The directive also requires feedback on how the report was handled within three months. Our case status supports this out of the box.
The directive prohibits retaliation against the reporter. Your hiring, compensation, and assignment records need to be defensible. The case log is the source of truth for that.
If you have staff in multiple EU countries, the local transposition may add extra requirements. Our locales system maps each country to its specific law.
FAQ
No, not directly. The AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) requires general-purpose AI providers to enable fundamental-rights complaints under Article 86. A whistleblower channel is required by the separate Directive 2019/1937, which applies to legal entities with 50+ employees. Most AI companies we work with operate the single internal channel that satisfies both — the legal duties are complementary, not duplicative.
Not for EU Directive 2019/1937 compliance. But if you sell to enterprise customers, the SOC 2 / ISO 27001 questionnaires most large buyers use will ask "do you have an internal reporting channel?" Saying "no" is increasingly disqualifying. The cost of a 14-day free trial is much lower than losing a deal over that question.
Yes. The intake is a public URL — reporters can file from any browser, in any country, in any of 17 languages. The dashboard is a normal web app. There is nothing to install on the reporter's device or in your infrastructure.
Our role is the intake and the case log. The actual anti-retaliation protection (employment law, HR investigations) is your responsibility. What we do provide is a defensible record: every case has a full event log with timestamps and the acting user, so any subsequent retaliation claim can be cross-referenced against the case timeline.
Yes. You can set a default assignee per case category, so reports about model bias, data privacy, or eval integrity go straight to the right person. Multi-stage review (initial triage, then escalation) is also supported.
Ja. EU-direktivet om beskyttelse af whistleblowere (artikel 10, stk. 2, litra b) angiver udtrykkeligt "stemme-til-tekst-funktioner" som en kompatibel kanal. Vores stemmeinput transskriberer i whistleblowerens browser og sletter derefter lyden. Serveren ser kun den resulterende tekst.
Inden for 7 dage efter modtagelse. EU-direktiv 2019/1937 (artikel 7) kræver bekræftelse inden for 7 dage og feedback på resultatet inden for 3 måneder. Vores platform håndhæver begge frister som synlige timere pr. sag.
De fleste SOC 2-revisioner leder efter tre ting: (1) en dokumenteret indtagelse med en tilgængelig URL, (2) en bekræftelses-SLA med tidsstempler, og (3) en manipulationssikker log over, hvem der håndterede sagen. Vi har alle tre som en del af standardproduktet.
For den private sektor gælder direktivet juridiske enheder med 50+ ansatte. For den offentlige sektor gælder det alle enheder med 10+ kommunale ansatte og alle statslige organer uanset størrelse.
Related reading
Start a 14-day free trial. The compliance is included, the audit log is included, the encryption is included.